safetybriefs.org

Inside the hot and sweaty world of safety

-->
  • Disclaimer

      * Snug Harness assumes no liability as to the information contained on this website. You should check the policies of your employer, and refer to state and federal regulations pertaining to the proper use of fall equipment.
  • -->

    Archive for the ‘Safety Articles’ Category

    Mar-8-2010

    “Ask Luke” Safety Questions: Anchor Points

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hey Luke,

    I hear you’re the fall protection expert who’s in the know. Here’s my question for you:
    Can I install the anchor points over my roof shingles?gd006451

    Sincerely,
    Ted

    This is a common question I get asked all the time and here’s  the answer in a nutshell:

    You must secure the anchor directly to the surface of what it is approved for.

    Now here’s the reason why:  It all goes back to when manufacturers test the anchors. Manufacturers do their pull out tests on what they approve it for. For example, if they approve their anchor for 3/4″ plywood. What they’re going to do is attach the anchor directly to the Plywood and do the testing and see if it holds up. (I am just simplifying what actually goes on) They approve it.  So now, if you take and put a shingle in between the anchor and the plywood you are changing the parameters and creating a totally different test because the shingle creates a gap that can change the results. Therefore it is not approved to do this in the field.

    Why don’t they test it with shingles and see if it holds up? Great questions - it’s because there are so many different roofing materials out there that would make it near impossible to test for everyone. And there is a huge liability by allowing the workers to install these in the field this way - too many different variables means too many risks in these situations.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Mar-1-2010

    Fall Protection, Fatalities and a “Lucky” Break

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In early February, Terry Thompson, 51, was killed from a 100 ft fall as he worked on dismantling a cell phone tower. He had almost 30 years experience. OSHA and local officials are still investigating.

    The same day in Florida, construction worker Daniel Caldwell, 40, died after a 25 ft fall off a roof.

    Two weeks ago construction worker David Pink, 25, was injured in a 60 ft construction fall. Pink was taking plywood off the top floor of a building when the wind caught him and he went off the edge head first.

    Most recent sources say that Pink’s 30 ft retractable did not engage and when he hit the end of the retractable he flipped and the cable snapped. After the cable snapped he continued to fall another 30 ft, shattering his hip and the side of his face. What saved his life was that he was working across the street from a hospital and the ambulance, as well as a doctor, arrived in minutes. He was able to get to the UW Trauma center immediately.

    Most retractables need to be re-certified every 2 years and it was believed this retractable was closer to 3 years. OSHA is investigating this accident.

    Most people don’t get do overs. Stay safe! 100% tie-off, check your equipment, keep up to date, train your workers properly! DO what you need to do for everyone to stay safe and alive.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Feb-22-2010

    OSHA Fines $539,000 After Worker’s Death

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This week I was researching recent (this month) deaths and injuries that occurred because of falls. These falls ranged from 25- 100 ft with both inexperienced and experienced workers. OSHA posted the following release this month and I thought I would post a portion of it:


    WASHINGTON, Pa. - The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has fined the C.A. Franc construction company $539,000 following the investigation of a roofing worker who fell 40 feet to his death at a Washington worksite. The Valencia, Pa.-based roof installer - whose owner is Christopher A. Franc - was cited for 10 per instance willful citations for failing to protect workers from falls.

    “Mr. Franc knowingly and willfully failed to protect his workers from falling to their death,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels. “We will not tolerate this type of blatant and egregious disregard for the health and safety of workers.”

    OSHA began its investigation immediately following the worker’s death on Aug. 15, 2009, and found the C.A. Franc company had failed to provide any fall protection to its employees working on a pitched roof 40 feet off the ground. In addition, Mr. Franc failed to train a newly hired college student in hazards and the necessary safety measures for roofing work. As a result of the investigation, the company has been cited for 10 alleged per-instance willful violations, one for each employee working unprotected on the roof, with a proposed penalty of $490,000, and one additional alleged willful violation for failing to train the new employee, with a penalty of $49,000.

    General contractor Hospitality Builders Inc. also has been cited with one willful violation and a proposed penalty of $70,000 for failing to ensure that C.A. Franc workers had fall protection.

    “This fall fatality was one of five that occurred during a 15-day span in the Pittsburgh area,” said John M. Hermanson, OSHA’s regional administrator in Philadelphia, Pa. “Falls are the leading cause of fatalities in the construction industry. Failure to provide employees with fall protection is unconscionable. We urge construction companies to take the necessary action to ensure their workers are protected.”

    http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=

  • Fall Protection, Fatalities and a “Lucky” Break
  • OSHA Fines for Construction Fall Leading to Death
  • Free Workplace Safety Resources
  • Top 40 Award: Positive Impact for On-the-Job Safety in Construction
  • Safety No-Brainer Day
  • Safety With The Simpsons
  • On a Serious Note: Die Another Day
  • OSHA’s Top 10: In A Bad Way
  • Top 5 Best Harnesses Currently Available
  • Ladder Safety in the Land of Morons
  • Who Does ANSI Think They Are?
  • Roofing Jobs
  • Top Three Safety Blogs For October 2008
  • Tower Dogs Unite!
  • Safety Harness Saves Life
  • Fall Protection In Antarctica
  • OSHA Fines of the Week: “Would an idiot do that?”
  • Expedite
  • Deadliest Job in America: Cell Phone Repair Person?
  • Do I feel lucky?’ Well, do ya, punk?
  • _RELEASES&p_id=17160

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Feb-13-2010

    OSHA Fines for Construction Fall Leading to Death

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In August of 2009 a masonry worker for a Pennsylvania construction company died after falling 13 feet from the roof of the building he was working on.  A fellow co-worker said they were pulling cables to the roof and they weren’t wearing a fall harness because they, “were only working on the roof of the Romanesque building.”

    Today OSHA has proposed $70,000 in fines (for one willful violation), citing a failure to protect workers from falls. The company was also cited for the same violation in 2007 but failed to remedy the situation. OSHA defines a willful violation as, “one committed with plain indifference to or intentional disregard for employee safety and health.” and gives the company, “15 days to comply, request a conference with OSHA officials, or contest the ruling and fine.”

    Detailed information about fall hazards and safeguards is available on OSHA’s Web site at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/fallprotection/construction.html.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Feb-1-2010

    Workplace Safety and Cold - Brrrrr!

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Photo by NIOSH

    Photo by NIOSH

    One workplace safety hazard I never considered until recently was the weather, specifically cold weather. I live in frick’n cold Wisconsin. A good friend (who lives in frick’n cold Minnesota) shared about his new job where he works outside installing satellite dishes. I asked if work was ever canceled because of the weather conditions - he said never. I found that concerning. Working on a slippery roof, below freezing weather, and installing stuff… sounds like a recipe for disaster.

    I asked around one of the safety groups I belong to and one of the NIOSH guys sent me a great link that discussed the dangers of cold weather:  http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/coldstress/

    If you read through the whole article there are recommendations for employers and workers. I am sorry to say that my friend’s employer does very little to protect the workers. Seems like it takes an injury or death for something to change.

    Employers should take the following steps to protect workers from cold stress:

    • Schedule maintenance and repair jobs in cold areas for warmer months.
    • Schedule cold jobs for the warmer part of the day.
    • Reduce the physical demands of workers.
    • Use relief workers or assign extra workers for long, demanding jobs.
    • Provide warm liquids to workers.
    • Provide warm areas for use during break periods.
    • Monitor workers who are at risk of cold stress.

    Provide cold stress training that includes information about:

    Stay warm and stay safe.

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | 2 comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Jan-23-2010

    Good News in Workplace Safety: Record Low in Miners’ Deaths for 2009

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Mining Construction Tux HarnessThe Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) released data earlier this month showing that mine fatalities last year fell to an all time low.

    I think it is interesting to note that December 30th, 1969 was when the Coal Act was signed. Below is an excerpt from MSHA’s Assistant Secretary, Joe Main.

    “…I want to note a very important anniversary in mine safety and health. This year we will celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, known as the Coal Act. Signed on December 30, 1969, this law represents a watershed moment in the improvement of occupational health and safety in the United States. It was the precursor to the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which created MSHA, and it was the basis of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) of 1970. The Coal Act forever transformed occupational safety and health in the United States.”

    Laws can make a difference. You can make a difference.

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Jan-12-2010

    Mailbag Question: When Do You Replace a Harness?

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dear Luke,
    I’m using a harness that I’ve had stored in the barn for the past decade. It was used infrequently but wasn’t stored super great. When is it time to replace a harness? What’s its shelf life?
    Wondering

    This question is often asked. I’ve seen harness that needed to be disposed after one year and others that are in great condition after a decade. Here’s what you need to know:

    Most fall protection companies use the ANSI standard and the five year life as a guideline. This is only a guideline. You must inspect your harness and follow the maintenance guidelines that go with the harness. Do you see damage? Has it been left out in the elements? Has it been exposed to chemicals or intense heat? How it’s taken care of may shorten it’s life. Good care and maintenance may extend it (store at room temperature away from chemicals, moisture, and ultra-violet light). Your harness and lanyards should have instructions for their use, inspection and cleaning. Check it out.

    Fall protection companies require that, “all fall protection products to be visually inspected prior to use and regularly inspected by a ‘Competent Person’, such as defined by OSHA or CSA.”

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | 1 comment | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Jan-5-2010

    Lead Free Safety Tapes: Making Green Choices

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Choosing lead-free traction tapes:

    Think about what goes into our landfills. At the end of a product’s life cycle it’s going to end up in the garbage and then a landfill. Lead-free products won’t contaminate a landfill which is a win-win for green-conscious businesses and individuals. Choosing products, like True Grip Traction tapes, that are Lead Free and RoHS Compliant is a great idea. To be considered RoHS Compliant, products must follow the regulations of RoHS which looks at equipment/products containing lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, PBB, & PBDE flame retardants.

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Dec-22-2009

    Anti-Slip Tape Advice: Acylic vs Rubber Adhesives

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After researching safety tapes the past couple weeks I know more than I thought possible about safety tapes.

    This weeks tip:  Chose acrylic adhesives instead of rubber adhesives for anti-slip tape.

    If you have the choice, go with the acrylic adhesives. It’s going to save you time and money in the long run when you eventually go to remove the safety tape. (The tape has to be replaced sometime!) When pulled up, the acrylic adhesives leaves behind no residue (yeah!) but if it’s a rubber based safety tape you’re going to need some acetate and some good old fashion elbow grease to rub away the residue. From a maintenance standpoint, the choice is clear -save your knees and time.

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | Add comments | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)
    Dec-1-2009

    Award: America’s Safest Companies of 2009 (Wahoo!)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Every week Google sends me updates of the latest OSHA fines and workplace safety stories so it was awesome to read this week about amazing companies who are making their company the “safest.”

    The America’s Safest Companies Award was founded in 2002. It honors companies that achieve specific criterias in safety. This year the criteria got even harder, where the selection team picked companies that demonstrated “Visionary thinking… were practically perfect…and over the top” in safety.

    EHS Today, sponsors of this award, wrote that these companies, “provide a safe working environment for tens of thousands of employees, protect the environment and act as advocates for health and safety.”
    The criteria:

    • Support from management and employee involvement.
    • Innovative solutions to safety challenges.
    • Injury and illness rates lower than average for their industries.
    • Comprehensive training programs.
    • Evidence that prevention of incidents is the cornerstone of the safety process.
    • Good communication about the value of safety.
    • Way to substantiate the benefits of the safety process.

    This years winners:

    AMEC Earth & Environmental Inc.,The Concrete Pipe Div. of CEMEX, Medtronic Inc., Morin Actuator, RQ Construction Inc., Trendmaker Homes, Trihydro Corp., and Wood Group Power Plant Services.

    Source: http://ehstoday.com/safety/asc/

    Technorati Tags: ,

    Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post | 1 comment | Bookmark and Share | (No Ratings Yet)